Tutorial
Right robotic-assisted thoracic surgery retrograde fissureless en bloc S2/6 bisegmentectomy
We describe a demanding procedure involving resection of a non-palpable lesion resting in the middle of the posterior aspect of the undeveloped oblique fissure, between the right S2 and S6 segments. Four ports were utilized, and the da Vinci X system was used. The resection started from the V6. Because the fissure was not complete, a tunnel was created below the B6 and towards the area between the A6 and the rest of the basal pulmonary artery. The division of the S6 segment from the lower lobe followed. After the B6 was divided, the A6 was divided separately from the A2 although they originated with a common trunk. The B2 division followed. Finally, the S2 segment was detached, completing the S2/6 bisegmentectomy. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on post-operative day 1. The final histologic report confirmed an adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer (pT1bN0M0V1PL0) with negative margins (R0). At the follow-up examination, the patient was well without cancer recurrence.
Sublobar and complex anatomical lung resections are made feasible with the implementation of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in everyday practice [1]. More surgeons proceed with such resections, led by the increasing body of published literature regarding tips and tricks around such complex sublobar resections [2]. However, to our knowledge, a RATS en block S2 with S6 complex bisegmentectomy has not been thoroughly described [1, 3].
We report a complicated case involving the resection of a non-palpable lesion within the posterior aspect of the oblique fissure. Because the fissure was not developed, it necessitated a retrograde S6 segmentectomy followed by en bloc resection of the S2 segmentectomy.
1 - Patient presentation and inferior pulmonary ligament and lymph node dissection (0:13)
Patient presentation
A 76-year-old male with a background of hypertension, gout and arthritis was referred because of an incidental, 18-mm, partially ground-glass/partially solid opacity of the right lung following a chest infection. Clinical assessment was unremarkable. The patient was an active smoker with a performance score of 0.
His lung function test results showed a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 103% and a transfer factor for carbon monoxide of 84%.
Investigations revealed a 18- x 12-mm right lung lesion, positioned in a totally incomplete oblique fissure, within its posterior aspect and most of its length lying between segments 2 and 6. The lesion was increasing in size on the follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan; a subsequent positron emission tomography scan showed the lesion to be mildly avid (standard uptake value 1.9) while it excluded any other disease.
A CT-guided biopsy was not feasible because of the fear of complications and of the significant possibility of missing the diagnosis.
The lung multidisciplinary team members decided to go with resection of the lesion.
An en block bisegmentectomy of the adjacent segments 6 and 2 was recommended to ensure resection of the lesion and provide an acceptable oncological outcome.
The procedure was performed using the da Vinci X system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) (utilizing 4 ports: 2 x 12 mm and 2 x 8 mm). The surgeon prefers to avoid inserting ports behind the scapular line in order to minimize pain and to set the ports in a straight line.
Inferior pulmonary ligament and lymph node dissection
After docking and inserting the instruments, the inferior pulmonary ligament was divided. The posterior hilum was dissected, retracting the lung anteriorly. Station 7 was dissected and sent for histological analysis. Next, station 4 was opened, and lymph node dissection of stations 4R and 2R was completed.
2 - Division of V6 (1:07)
The inferior pulmonary vein was dissected posteriorly. The V6, together with the rest of the basal vein tributaries, was recognized and dissected. The V6 was disconnected with a vascular robotic SureForm stapler (Intuitive).
3 - Attempt to create the fissure (1:28)
Because it was anticipated that the oblique fissure was not developed posteriorly (where the lesion was positioned), we attempted to create the fissure anteriorly in an effort to dissect the pulmonary artery (PA). This endeavour was tedious, and the PA sheath was entered. The anatomy of the PA was clarified, and all branches were recognized. At this stage, an anatomical variation was observed with the A6 originating with a common trunk with the A2b (posterior recurrent branch). Based on these findings and the position of the lesion, it was decided that the S6 should be detached first to avoid traumatizing the common arterial trunk and also to avoid missing the lesion.
4 - Tunnel to fissure and separation of S6 (1:55)
Starting posteriorly and on top of the basal part of the inferior pulmonary vein, slow and careful dissection continued towards the middle of the fissure and under the B6 (exit point between the A6 and rest of artery for the basal segments of the lower lobe). A urine catheter was pulled through to designate the pathway of the segmental plane. Because the A6 was not divided, we could not use indocyanine green to demarcate the exact S6 segmental plane. The S6 was disconnected from the rest of the lower lobe with serial black robotic Sureform staplers (Intuitive).
5 - Division of B6 (2:23)
Once the S6 was detached from the lower lobe, the next structure divided was the B6, which was done similarly with the green stapler.
6 - Division of A6 and A2b (2:43)
Next, the A6 and A2b were divided with similar vascular staplers. This step was done separately because, given that the S6 and upper lobe were pushed apically, the A6 was seen first with the A2b being positioned posteriorly to it.
7 - Indocyanine green (3:01)
After all arterial branches were divided, indocyanine green was administered to demarcate the S2 segmental plane. The marking was done using cautery.
8 - Dissecting and dividing the B2 (3:12)
The posterior hilum was opened even further and more peripherally to identify the right upper lobe bronchus branching posteriorly. Dissection continued superiorly and anteriorly to the bronchus to ensure that a separate B3 was present. Once all the anatomical relationships were clarified, the B2 was divided with a green Sureform stapler.
9 - Disconnection of S2 (3:37)
The S2 was disconnected from the rest of the upper lobe using similar serial black staplers. The stapling line followed the previous markings created after administering indocyanine green, as previously described.
10 - Haemostasis, inserting the drain and inflating the lung (3:59)
The specimen was removed in an Endo bag (not shown in the video), and the surfaces were covered with a haemostatic agent. A 20 Fr chest drain was inserted postero-apically. After thorough endobronchial suctioning (performed by the anaesthetist), the lung was inflated.
11 - Outcome (4:20)
The patient was extubated and after recovery was taken to the ward. His post-operative chest X-ray was acceptable.
His recovery was uneventful, and he was found to be medically fit to be discharged the next day.
The histological report verified that the resected lesion was an adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer (pT1bN0M0V1PL0) with negative margins (R0).
The patient is without issues 1 year postoperatively without cancer recurrence.
Discussion
We present the case of a complex S2 and S6 bisegmentectomy, which was performed en bloc and in a retrograde manner due to the fact that the oblique fissure was not developed. A bisegmentectomy was also performed because it was not possible to determine the position of the lesion. During the procedure, an anatomical variation of the PA was encountered, with the A6 and the posterior ascending (A2b) originating from a common trunk.
Because of the incomplete fissure and the risk of missing the lesion, we decided to proceed with this complex bisegmentectomy starting from the V6 and then disconnecting the S6 from the lower lobe. Then, we carried out the rest of the steps as presented in a retrograde manner. Our chosen sequence of resection, to our knowledge, is entirely different from the sequence used in the cited steps in the only other case describing such a bisegment in the literature [3]. The feasibility of such diverse approaches is facilitated by rapid advances in robotic techniques.
During the operation, we encountered an anatomical variation of the PA with the A6 originating from a common trunk shared with the posterior ascending (A2b). This variation obviously hindered the dissection around the area of the PA, but we proceeded safely due to the robotic approach.
In terms of safety and oncological outcomes, anatomical sublobar resections are, performed more efficiently with 3-dimensional reconstructions [4, 5]. Unfortunately, in our case, such a reconstruction was not readily available but would have allowed us to map the details of the fissure better and of course identify the PA variation.
In our experience, RATS made feasible a complex en bloc retrograde bisegmentectomy that was performed safely and efficiently despite the anatomical variation and the incomplete fissure encountered during the procedure.
1. Wu H, Zhang Y, Hecheng L. Robotic complex segmentectomies. Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery 2020; 5: 28.
NA | Publisher Full Text
2. Perroni G, Veronesi G. Robotic segmentectomy: indication and technique. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:3404–10.
PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Dunning J, Waterhouse B. My Favourite Segmentectomy. Robotic S2+S6 Bisegmentectomy for an Interfissural Right Sided Tumour.
NA | Publisher Full Text
4. Nakamura S, Nakao M, Okado S, Kadomatsu Y, Ueno H, Chen-Yoshikawa TF. Robot-Assisted Complex Anatomical Segmentectomy Using Resection Process Map. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep 2024;2:643–5.
PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Wang LF, Zhao L, Lv CS, Xu QT, Wang R. Anatomical type analysis of right interlobar artery based on chest thin-slice CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;17: 328.
Vasileios Kouritas is a proctor for Intuitive.
Authors
Fatemeh Habibi Nameghi1–3, William Ansley3, Ra'fat Tawalbeh3, Haisam Saad3, Jonathon Francis3 & Vasileios Kouritas3
Affiliations
1Department of Bioscience, King’s College London University, London, United Kingdom
2Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
3Department of Thoracic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Corresponding Author
Vasileios Kouritas
Department of Thoracic Surgery
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Norwich
United Kingdom
© The Author 2025. Published by MMCTS on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
You may also like
Video atlas of pulmonary segmentectomy: robotic-assisted right S1 segmentectomy with 3-dimensional imaging
Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction imaging enables anatomical assessment of a tumour and the surrounding vasculature, allowing for precise surgical mapping and improved intraoperative orientation—to enhance preoperative planning, reduce postoperative morbidity, shorten hospital stay and hasten postoperative recovery.